|
|
  |
|
 |
 |
| |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Exploring “The Secret.” Part 1. The Tricky Business of Creating Your Own Reality.
|
|
|
|
|
Julian Walker h
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Julian Walker is a respected yoga teacher known for his
integrally-informed approach to transformation, healing, bodywork,
psychotherapy, and spirituality. He also maintains an active blog on
Zaadz.com, and some of his recent posts regarding the pop-spiritual phenomenon
known as “The Secret” caught our attention. Although clearly
not alone in expressing concerns about The Secret, we found Julian’s
views to be remarkably comprehensive, precisely because it's based in large measure on an explicitly integral framework.
The Secret, which can be found in both DVD and book
form, has managed to hit #1 on the New York Times bestseller list, and
maintain a firm grip on the top two spots at Amazon.com, Barnes and Noble, and
Borders for weeks. The central tenet of The Secret is “The
Law of Attraction,” whereby one’s feelings and thoughts quite
literally attract, manifest, and create real events in one’s
life—the assumption being that most of us do this unconsciously, and
making this process conscious is “The Secret” that “has
travelled through centuries to reach you.”
As Ken and Julian agree, what can be so tricky when
evaluating a new approach such as The Secret, is that at first glance it
can appear fairly innocent, even if lacking any kind of critical depth.
If it’s helping people feel empowered and positive about their lives,
what’s the problem?
Well, the problem is that it’s not a basically solid
approach with room for improvement, it’s a fundamentally confused way of
understanding reality that misunderstands and contorts the genuine truths that
it intuits. Some of the central points that Julian and Ken discuss are as
follows: • As with any “you create your own
reality” schema, The Secret fails what can be called “the Auschwitz
test.” According to The Secret, everyone who was murdered at
Auschwitz—or Rwanda, or Darfur—created that reality for themselves,
and therefore they are to blame for their fate. For obvious reasons, this
position is an unconscionable as it is untenable.
• By teaching that the world quite
literally revolves around you, The Secret encourages and entrenches narcissism.
In developmental psychology, narcissism doesn’t mean an unhealthy
obsession with thinking only about yourself, it means you can’t think
about yourself. The capacity for self-reflexive awareness just
isn’t there. The entire world and everyone in it is simply an extension
of your-self, and you are literally unable to take the perspective of another
human being. This is not mystical union; this is pre-rational fusion, and
without the ability to take the perspectives of other sentient beings, the entire
foundation for ethics evaporates.
• Actually, you are creating the
universe moment-to-moment, but it’s not the “you” that you
think. According to the great contemplative traditions, every person has
at least two “selves”: the finite, temporal, egoic self-sense, and
the infinite, transcendental, unqualifiable Self, or I-AMness. Your Self,
your I-AMness, is indeed giving rise to the entire radiant Kosmos in this and
every moment, but The Secret teaches that your separate self has the
power to personally manifest a new car, win the lottery, or cure cancer…
and this simply isn’t how things work.
• “The Law of Attraction” is
true—as far as it goes. The problem is that The Secret takes
this one relatively small piece of the puzzle and makes it the entire
puzzle. A positive outlook will change your life and your
intentions will co-create your reality, but so will brain chemistry,
interior level of development, family relationships, natural disasters,
cultural trends, language structure, environmental toxins, and, basically, the
slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.
• Developmentally, if one uses a scale
ranging from archaic to magic to mythic to rational
to pluralistic to integral to super-integral, The Secret
teaches the magical thought structures that were humanity’s leading edge
several hundred thousand years ago. As Ken explains, The Secret
encourages childlike “primary process thinking,” which can be in
the form of “the law of attraction” (e.g., if one black thing is bad,
then all black things are bad) and “the law of contagion” (e.g., if
this particular man was powerful, then a lock of his hair must be powerful
too).
• The importance of understanding how
unconscious psychological shadow elements color and affect one’s
experience, and how The Secret can agitate, alienate, repress, or—perhaps
even more worrisome—act on these disowned elements of
consciousness.
• The genesis of the pre/trans or pre/post
fallacy, and how The Secret is a perfect example of elevating pre-rational
childish impulses to trans-rational spiritual glory. Simply because both
categories of experience are non-rational, they can easily be confused,
and often are.
The extraordinary thing about this dialogue is that, for all
the critiques Ken and Julian have of The Secret, it’s not meant as a put-down
or a mean-spirited attack. As evidenced by its incredible popularity,
there are millions of people who are starving for something other than
traditional religion or modern science in their search for meaning. By
using an Integral Approach, one is able to look at what new offerings like The
Secret have to bring to the table, and assess in good faith what their
strengths and weaknesses really are, for the health and nourishment of every
soul who dare grasp for “something more”—and
for what we consider to be the real Secret
of transformation and human happiness, we recommend an Integral Life
Practice and an Integral Spirituality, bringing together Body, Mind, and Spirit, in Self,
Culture, and Nature.
We hope you’ll join us for this intelligent, exciting,
and illuminating exploration of one of the biggest waves in popular
spirituality today….
|
|
transmission time: 38 minutes |
Julian Walker’s Blog, Zaadz.com, The Secret, “What Is Integral?,”
infrared (archaic), magenta (magic), red (ego-power), amber (mythic),
orange (rational), green (pluralistic), teal (beginning integral), turquoise
(mature integral), indigo (super-integral, spiritual), “What Is
Altitude?,” Gene Gebser, Jane Loevinger, centauric,
vision-logic, pre/trans fallacy, pre-rational/rational/trans-rational,
reductionism, elevationism, Buddhism, Heinz Kohut, narcissism, subjectivity,
Freud, Jung, reality principle, primary process thinking, ethics, law of
attraction, law of contagion, Auschwitz, John Paul Sartre, shamanism, Atman, Fred
Alan Wolfe, quantum mechanics, What the Bleep Do We Know!?, Sam
Harris, Richard Dawkins, David Bohm, Integral Spirituality, A Brief History of Everything.
--->
|
most memorable moment: “It doesn’t
help for people to be eating cardboard for lunch, even if it has ‘God’
written all over it….” |
|
|
|